This URL is a challenge to ES&S â Demonstrate in situ how your products' outcomes exceed the accuracy of hand counts to be worthy of replacing them.
A number of hand counts in elections are being accepted by officials as
being more accurate than machine counts. Why
doesnât ES&S demonstratively defend their productsâ
error
rates
against the hand counts? They obviously canât they
show
in situ that their products have lower error rates than hand counts.
ES&S and Dominion election
products
suppliers are known to file lawsuits for up to billions of dollars
against the likes of Mike Lindell who expose their productsâ
failures and the company's scorn for due diligence, yet all the while the
companies themselves refuse to put up any of their
own money to protect their productsâ reputations by testing the
products in situ against the many hand counts that are proving the
machines
to
have illegally high error rates.
Very importantly, this is ONLY in races that ES&S targets to influence. Characteristics of these specific
races prove that they are being targeted instead of experiencing random errors.
It makes no sense that ES&S
refuses
to demonstrate their own productsâ accuracy like this while trying to
steal from the likes of Mike Lindell to protect their ill-deserved turf.
World wide and for all history an implied contract has always existed between voters and ballot position readers/counters, but the entry of ES&S machines into polling places has enlightened once naive voters to this fact.
An implied contract with you is being attempted by ES&S if you insert your completed ballot into their equipment. Such a contract is never legal nor binding unless many requisites are met. Please speak out publically and to your election officials about it and pray for these patriot efforts. Thank you!
COPY AND SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING TO YOUR ELECTION OFFICIALS!
Dear election officials,
Per state supreme court rulings, etc., an enforceable "implied-in-fact contract" arises between parties who signify agreement through an action â as in a voter surrendering a completed ballot according to instructions of election officials. Implied warranties and implied duties always accompany implied-in-fact contracts. This notice to you, by me the undersigned voter, reminds you of said contract and the accompanying implied warranties and duties that are binding by law upon you. By no means is this notice intended to educate you about centuriesâ-strong precedent, so if said subject is unfamiliar to you, you seriously need to consult your legal counsel lest you risk being derelict in your due diligence. This notice reminds you that, among a number of other responsibilities said contract binds you to, you are legally bound to implied warranty and implied duty.
Merely one of many aspects of the warranty is that you most accurately and honestly count and report all legitimate ballot selections while preventing dilutions by counting illegitimate votes. Vote totals in MANY recent elections have been in excess of the expected numbers of votes allowed, and I will no longer tolerate such breach of implied contract if it continues. Along with this is the implied duty to consider the most verifiable cast ballot by me to be the one and only authoritative ballot cast by me. I will not tolerate that my in-person ballot surrendered to you when I've presented irrefutable proof of my identity is destined for the category of "provisional" because an unknown person previously submitted a ballot in my name. This implied duty demands that you consider ballots surrendered to you in my name but without ID to be more provisional than my just-in-time ballots when I show valid ID.
Another of many implied duties incumbent upon you is that you reveal relevant information to me, including the fact, if true, that my ballot selections are converted into unsuperviseable electronic signals prior to them being counted, and that those unsuperviseable electronic signals are the most authoritative basis by which race results get reported. If any relevant facts are not acceptable to me, then I will be entering said contract under duress. As you can manifestly understand, the unsuperviseable possession in format mutable prior to counting or exploitable, by an entity whom I've not vetted for their character, motives, objectivity, etc., would certainly be unacceptable to me.
Signed______________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
____________________________________
PDF format, 3 up "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_legalsizepaper_FRONT" (Margins set for 3 up on legal paper, side margins minimal and equal)
ODT format, 3 up "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_legalsizepaper_FRONT" (Margins set for 3 up on legal paper, side margins minimal and equal)
PDF format "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_postcard_EQUAL_S" (Right and left margins set equal for double-sided printers)
ODT format "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_postcard_EQUAL_S" (Right and left margins set equal for double-sided printers)
PDF format "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_postcard_FRONT" (Margins set for printing the first page on single-sided printers)
ODT format "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_postcard_FRONT" (Margins set for printing the first page on single-sided printers)
PDF format "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_postcard_BACK" (Margins set for printing the second page on single-sided printers)
ODT format "Implied-in-fact Contract exists and is enforceable_postcard_BACK" (Margins set for printing the second page on single-sided printers)
Warning mug shot
Important -
Copy/pastable text version of the above document
Pro-Freedom Citizen Journalist Exercising Free Speech Through Investigative Reporting
Robert Borer's ES&S research, just one of several pages
Ocean Township, New Jersey school board race - a post-election audit failed to detect this ES&S flaw
Furthermore....
How hard would it be for ES&S election equipment to alert officials when there are blatant illegalities like too many ballots? (see Ocean Townshipâs Board of Education race reversed after machines allowed too many votes) Yet they don't care about that. But we sure do, right? To say that ES&S should not be allowed to remain in business is an understatement! Why would there be too many ballots? Most likely so if a hand recount were done, it would show leftist candidates with even more votes. I'm asserting that ES&S only interferes with a race results as little as they need to, claiming all other ballots went for the conservative. A hand recount would count the ballots of dead people and other phantoms that went far more for the leftist than the machines dared to claim. That way everybody would just be too budget-minded to investigate any further. This scenario occurs ALL THE TIME!
Suppose the machines reported zero votes for one of two candidates. This actually happened in November 2022, but it got noticed because the one candidate and her loved ones lived and voted in that very jurisdiction. They were the ONLY ones who were in any position to know the count was wrong. Of course, the voting machines gave the preliminary win to the leftist unanimously while a hand recount gave the final win to the conservative, but again, none dared call it treason. We MUST get more courageous, patriots! You need to tell election officials you are being forced under duress to enter an implied contract - you oppose some undisclosed and unvetted by you third party having authoritative ballot position counting power.
Evidence in pptx Power Point slideshow of the entire election wireless network! pdf format
Omaha, Nebraska - not as innocent as you thought it was!
|
||||||
Thieves are targeting God's people's sacred votes | ||||||
Omaha churches...Nebraska churches, WHERE ARE YOU?! The devil got your tongues? |
||||||
|
||||||
Did you know that computerized vote-counting products in election offices around the WORLD keep getting âshut downâ at the end of the election day BEFORE their final vote counts are made public? Ex-employees of the election products companies doing this tell us the reason â this shutdown allows coordination between vote-counting corruption efforts to alter campaign races vote counts so that privileged races, if about to lose the race, can be advantaged with enough secret malicious vote count manipulation to appear to come from behind and win by just enough margin to avoid recounts |
||||||
Omaha churches...Nebraska churches, WHERE ARE YOU?! The devil got your tongues? |
||||||
|
||||||
Consider that President Donald Trumpâs real margin of re-election victory could NOT have been overcome solely by the treachery of diminutive Dominion. If Dominion had not leveraged ES&S's nation-wide vote count share they would have left a HUGE telltale statistical difference in election results between Dominion-serviced and the FAR larger ES&S-serviced precincts. That large of a difference would be shockingly obvious because the number of votes that ES&S election products count are twice the number that Dominion counts. In other words, without ES&S collusion, Dominionâs treacherous election products alone in no way could have had a chance stealthily to overcome President Trumpâs true margin of re-election victory. |
||||||
Mike Lindell talks about ES&S: July 5, 2022 "The Lindell Report" on FrankSpeech, (forward to the 11:30 timestamp) The following report is provided to the public by Robert J. Borer, retired Fire Captain and Congressional Public Safety Medal of Valor Award recipient: |
||||||
Omaha churches...Nebraska churches, WHERE ARE YOU?! The devil got your tongues? |
||||||
|
||||||
Did you know that Omaha churches, of all churches in the nation, are uniquely attended by more ex-ES&S software developers and product technicians who are patriots and very willing, given the encouragement that their efforts would contribute to the cause and be synergistic with othersâ, to testify of their first-hand knowledge of election-corrupting capabilities of ES&S products and services?
Read this: information
from an insider |
||||||
|
||||||
Omaha
churches...Nebraska churches, why didnât we know?
NOTICE TO ES&S: We are VERY willing to take this web site down if you will contract with us that WHEN YOUR ELECTION CHEATING IS PROVEN YOUâLL GIVE YOUR WORLDWIDE ASSETS TO US. If your products and services did not corrupt election results, then you should be quite happy to make such a contract. ES&S, STOP SHUTTING DOWN THE TALLYING LATE ON ELECTION NIGHT TO STEAL THE VOTE!!!! It is SO obvious what you're doing during the shutdown! Races will flip and be won by just enough margins to avoid recounts. DUH! It's called HIGH TREASON. Did you even THINK before you got yourself into this? Patriots will NOT let you prevail...to the last patriot. NOTICE TO ALL â An event will be a sign of the shame of the counsel of ES&S attorneys and a sign that Heaven secures the ownership of ES&S assets WORLDWIDE for NEW WINESKINS UNLEASHED: ES&S attorneys will one day, without any human intervention, fall nto mud in their dress outfits and be muddied from their faces down to their dress shoes. Said event will have recorded proof for the world to see it. These statements are being made PROPHETICALLY without any intent by NEW WINESKINS UNLEASHED to influence by non-prophetic means to their fulfillment. |
||||||
|
"Cleanup in aisle 46" I Alwaysknew 45:1 |
||||||
Real letter:
pcharvey@pbwt.com
Subject: ES&S and the county investigation
Honorable Peter C. Harvey,
Several ES&S election machine counting errors have been exposed in recent elections. Some came to light through hand recounts, others by inconsistent machine recounts. If even ONE of them is real this many years after the technology has been able to be perfected, their too-expensive gig needs to be over. There is no advantage of election machines so important that it should come at the expense of accuracy. If speed was one of those supposed advantages, ES&S and Dominion machine counting pauses for several hours after midnight in several elections totally debunk that as being important to the people in control of the machines. Please cut no slack to ES&S for any of their sloppiness. Purported advantages of free, fair, secure, speed, and anything else are insidious distractions to the most important need for accuracy in elections. Ballot counting accuracy is profoundly SACRED. I urge you not to be swayed by ES&Sâ other distracting sales pitches for their products. It bears repeating and emphasis at the risk of sounding trite: accuracy cannot be sacrificed on the altars of any of their other sales pitches, especially that silly, shiny sales pitch of speed.
As a concerned citizen and resident of Nebraska, I hope youâll accept my letter for your investigation of election problems. I ask you to consider the poor track record of ES&S election machine accuracy around the country. Whenever hand counts are conducted following ES&S machines counts, ES&S NEVER defends their machine accuracies. NEVER. They ALWAYS make some excuse about why their machine counts donât match hand counts. I therefore ask you to agree with ES&S about that - their machines do not count votes accurately.
ES&S worldwide headquarters are located in Omaha, NE. For counting votes the entire state uses ES&S products and services exclusively. Although ES&S is by far the largest of the election machine companies in the entire country, they do NOT have a stellar reputation here in their home state. The people of this state, those who are informed anyway, are trying to get ES&S machines eliminated in favor of hand counting. ES&S seems to be doing their absolute best to go under the radar in silence. This kind of attraction they have to darkness indicates to us that they are dishonest and fearful of exposure. We have been observing those mysterious election night counting shutdowns followed by race reversals then squeaky tight victories by candidates who were never ahead during election day counting, and we are doggone fed up with it!
It is public knowledge that Scott County, IA is known to have proven ES&S equipment count problems in a legislative race last November. Maybe not so public is that a precinct in South Dakota caught ES&S equipment miscounting, reported here: https://robertjborer.substack.com/p/breaking-news-in-sd. These machines are legally required to achieve error rates far, far below the error rates ES&S is tacitly admitting to by their silence to defend them. Worse for ES&S would be for them to attract attention trying and failing to defend the indefensible, but PLEASE challenge them to do so anyway for the sake of accurate elections.
Besides the accuracy problems, WI investigator the Honorable Michael Gableman states in his 2020 election investigative report that ES&S machines allowed suspicious election night remote logins and vote count tampering. Nebraska's handicapped booths were caught with ES&S wifi vulnerabilities. You can be sure these incidents are but a tiny fraction of ES&S' inexcusable and apparently malevolent anomalies.
Thank you!
Thank you! Motivated parties, if you want to help let ES&S know they can't stay under the radar any longer, please consider sending something like this yourself.
ALSO: Emailed to Lancaster County Board of Commissioners on July 25, 2023
Dear Lancaster County Board of Commissioners,
According to Sam Lyon, this county's GOP chair, the supposed "random" audits of precincts are not random at all. Instead, the only precincts that are eligible for these audits are those that appear on their face to be totally in order. Excluded first from being chosen for audit are those precincts that have some characteristics of or are characteristic of fraud. Is this true? Sam said he knows this from his first hand presence, observation, questioning and receiving answers to this effect from election officials. If true, the very precincts disqualified from post election random audits are the ones most needing to be looked into for fraud.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Hand counting of paper ballots is the gold standard for elections.
Whenever hand counts double-checked the race results of ES&S election equipment, ES&S invariably, that means in 100% of the instances, eventually acquiesced to the results of the hand counts, thereby confirming that hand counting of paper ballots is the gold standard for elections. Whether either method gives perfection is not the point, is it? The point is which method do the people trust more. If ES&S doesn't trust their own products, they show how clueless they are gaining people's trust.
If ES&S were an honest company, they would recall their products immediately until they gleaned from every single one of those instances why the difference is there. Then, they would gain the people's trust with transparency. Instead, they let some of those hand count results stand without appearing to care why their machines report differently. In other cases they blame causes that they didn't know existed prior to some candidate drawing their attention to a miscount - a situational awareness deficiency unbecoming of an organization as large as ES&S.
Of course, ES&S is required to self report to you, or to somebody at least, their vote count failures...aren't they? Does anyone know if they are subject to self reporting rules by any authority whatsoever?
Why shouldn't election officials be more than willing to let ES&S investigate every race to any and every degree? In fact, why aren't election officials DEMANDING that, now that they prove to have a MUCH poorer track record than 1 in 10,000,000 error rate? Let me say this as loud and clear as I can - ES&S is grossly cavalier only to care about miscounts by their equipment if someone who they think highly enough of MAKES them care, rather than performing the required ongoing 100% oversight of their products and procedures that is justified because of their many times they have to acquiesce to the superiority of hand count accuracies.
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Implied-in-fact Contract" exists between each voter and their election officials and is enforceable once a ballot is surrendered properly
source - https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/ne-supreme-court/1669167.html accessed 07/24/2023 10:21am
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Martin V. Linscott, individually and on behalf of Shasteen, Linscott & Brock, P.C., a Nebraska professional corporation, appellant, v. Rolf Edward Shasteen and Tony J. Brock, appellees.
No. Sâ13â597
Decided: June 06, 2014
second paragraph of the "ANALYSIS" section contains:
"....We therefore begin our analysis by setting out the established Nebraska law on implied in fact contracts.
To create a contract, there must be both an offer and an acceptance; âthere must also be a meeting of the minds or a binding mutual understanding between the parties to the contract.2 âA binding mutual understanding or meeting of the minds sufficient to establish a contract requires no precise formality or express utterance from the parties about the details of the proposed agreement; âit may be implied from the parties' conduct and the surrounding circumstances.3
An implied contract arises where the intention of the parties is not expressed in writing but where the circumstances are such as to show a mutual intent to contract.4 âEvidence of facts and circumstances, together with the words of the parties used at the time, from which reasonable persons in conducting the ordinary affairs of business, but with special reference to the particular matter on hand, would be justified in inferring such a contract or promise, is sufficient.5 The determination of the parties' intent to make a contract is to be gathered from objective manifestationsâthe conduct of the parties, language used, or acts done by them, or other pertinent circumstances surrounding the transaction.6 If the parties' conduct is sufficient to show an implied contract, it is just as enforceable as an express contract.7"
7. âhttps://law.justia.com/cases/nebraska/supreme-court/2011/s-10-753.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assert that many thousands of Breaches of Implied Duty exist by election officials relative to:
- implied warranty to count accurately even down to this single vote using the counting means that has been demonstrated to be most accurate
- implied warranty to prevent diluting of this vote by illicit votes overtly and publicly known and observable in excess of legitimate numbers of votes
- implied warranty to reveal relevant information within contracts with and as to the suitability of moral character of parties empowered (legally or not) to so control the reporting of race outcomes and whether said reporting is capable of deviating from truth and honesty even to the extent of exerting significant effect on whether candidates might demand hand recounts of original paper ballots. The moral character of said parties will most certainly be relevant to many if not most voters if said parties are or employ felons or ex-felons, communists, satanists, atheists, anti-American persons, etc. Do they have political bias? (WHO DOESN'T!) Or malicious intent? Considering the position of Edison Research polling company, there are so many possibilities for bad actors in these capacities maliciously to affect race outcomes and to maliciously manipulate the expectations of voters and groom them to accept planned manipulated race results. No laws prohibit any of these RELEVANT things from existing, but they are profoundly relevant to many if not most voters who vehemently oppose them being between them and the final race results.
- implied warranty to reveal relevant information that ES&S is not subject to ANY self reporting requirements for when they've acquiesced to hand counts proving their products to be inaccurate and/or untruthful.
Bcc: My Election Corruption Investigators group
ALSO: (never delivered)
In elections world wide and for all history, implied-in-fact contracts have always been formed when voters surrender their ballots to election officials. Just like any other implied-in-fact contract, it is legally enforceable. In other words, contractual duties are legally required of election officials' for the outcomes of elections to be binding upon the voters. Since this Board has some oversight or action item responsibilities related to ES&S or election officials, I'll address you as sharing in being duty-bound about this issue. You can't use your attorneys to do your thinking for you, although if they've been diligent and already told all of this, there's a good sign from them. Among election officials numerous responsibilities they must protect legitimate votes from getting watered down by illegitimate ones. Because elections have been conducted in which ES&S has ignored illegitimate numbers of votes, the ES&S-counted races in those elections must be obviated. No lesser remedy combination will be acceptable to voters. If you do not demand that ES&S reverence this your contractual requirement with voters, you are derelict in your duties.
This duty is only one of several you are allowing ES&S to make you derelict in. It is also a form of fraud if one of the parties in an implied contract attempts to renege on or alter their responsibilities by not revealing relevant information including whether any third parties like ES&S are of high enough moral character to convert uncounted and unrecorded ballot selections into proprietary electronic signals that become more authoritative at that moment of conversion than the original ballot. The implied contract is with the voter so it is the voter who will determine what information is relevant and what level of moral character they demand of ES&S. It is not illegal for ES&S to be communist or have malicious intent or be unconscionable or be atheist or be satanist, but most or all voters would agree that those things are relevant and have not been revealed prior to them forming the implied contract by their action of surrendering their completed ballot.
It's likely that the election officials also could have implied-in-law contracts with to the extent of protecting legitimate votes in other counties from getting watered down by illegitimate ones from your county on a shared ballot proposition. Your responsibility to ensure protections extends out far beyond just this county.
For example, supposing you disclosed as contractually required that ES&S handles my completed ballot unsupervised and unsupervisable, yet I as a voter am forcibly kept from information relevant to me to vet ES&S to my satisfaction. Knowing certain information about them is RELEVANT to me, but they don't publish it. I want to know if they meet higher moral standards than the law cares about or even is allowed to care about - like, are they conscionable and without malicious intent for starters. I don't want unsuperviseable handling of my ballot selections by communist, anti-american, atheist, or satanist parties at ANY level - the consciences of these types are not acceptable to me even though the law allows them to run this kind of business. I assume that your official capacity would limit you to vet to ANY of these standards that I have. The mere fact that I am not allowed to know relevant information I may ask for is grounds to obviate race outcomes. In fact, relevant information is kept undisclosed to us steadfastly, us if not illegally.
You have several other additional requirements in implied contracts that do exist with many coerced voters. Again, voters being put under duress does not nullify the existence of the implied contracts, but it does give voters standing to challenge the declared outcomes.
The contract terms that the people would never be able to examine the paper ballots in recounts is not acceptable to me, a party coerced to this implied contract involvement. Ignorance of the law by either party of any of these requirements does not nullify the existence of an implied contract, but such ignorance can certainly make the election officials and all voting bodies above them unable to legally conduct any more of those style elections PLUS obviate the results of decades of prior elections.
Those of us addressing this Lancaster County Board are very acutely aware that if we postulated a legal challenge against you, you'd feel justified in never responding to us about this except through your attorneys. So we state emphatically that we are NOT intending to take any legal action against this county. We don't need to. Legal action in any other county in Nebraska will satisfy us, and that is exactly what we hope will happen organically due to this livestream.
